Malami, in a statement issued by Dr Umar Gwandu, his Special Assistant on Media, on Wednesday, in Abuja said his attention had been drawn to the media reports relating to purported characterisation of the recovered assets associated with the former Head of State as “Abacha Assets”.
He maintained that the choice of words was deliberate.
READ ALSO: Oyedepo kicks against church closure over COVID-19
“It is to be noted that by way of antecedence, I have been consistently describing the recovered funds as “Abacha loot” at several fora during the process of recovery particularly before the eventual repatriation of the funds.
“The point needs to be made that when the seal of legitimacy was appended to the funds by way of repatriation, it became an asset in favour of the Federal Government as a beneficial owner of same.
“Beyond the issues of verbal dexterity and vocal acrobatics, Nigerians should focus more on the effective utilisation of the recovered funds in accordance with the content of the signed tripartite agreement in the interest of Nigerians.”
He said the use of the word ‘assets’ in relation to the post-recovery of looted funds is to qualify the same as federal government assets.
He said the return of the looted funds demonstrated not only commendable efforts of the present government, but also a pointer to the level of confidence, trust and respect the international community accorded the Buhari-led Federal Government.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment